<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The eternal stuggle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://existentialtype.net/2006/11/15/the-eternal-stuggle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://existentialtype.net/2006/11/15/the-eternal-stuggle/</link>
	<description>For People Who Like Type and Types</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 08:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: washburn</title>
		<link>http://existentialtype.net/2006/11/15/the-eternal-stuggle/comment-page-1/#comment-785</link>
		<dc:creator>washburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 20:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://existentialtype.net/?p=74#comment-785</guid>
		<description>Well, I expect that people must fall for spams of any variety, or people wouldn't bother.  It is probably just that even though it is a very small percentage, it is enough on the total amount of spam sent to make it worthwhile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I expect that people must fall for spams of any variety, or people wouldn&#8217;t bother.  It is probably just that even though it is a very small percentage, it is enough on the total amount of spam sent to make it worthwhile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: washburn</title>
		<link>http://existentialtype.net/2006/11/15/the-eternal-stuggle/comment-page-1/#comment-780</link>
		<dc:creator>washburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 18:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://existentialtype.net/?p=74#comment-780</guid>
		<description>Sounds like you don't have CaSH installed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like you don&#8217;t have CaSH installed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://existentialtype.net/2006/11/15/the-eternal-stuggle/comment-page-1/#comment-776</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://existentialtype.net/?p=74#comment-776</guid>
		<description>i was attempting to build ocamltex on my mac (10.4). all my software's up to date, but I get a fail.

This is not a rush, but I thought it would be cool to leverage my ocaml beginnings with LaTeX something I use frequently.

I've not much experience with makefiles. Here's the dump:

File "ocamltex.ml", line 28, characters 0-9:
Unbound module Cash
*** omake: 17/22 targets are up to date
*** omake: failed (0.9 sec, 0/2 scans, 1/4 rules, 1/80 digests)
*** omake: targets were not rebuilt because of errors:
   ocamltex.cmo
   ocamltex.cmi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i was attempting to build ocamltex on my mac (10.4). all my software&#8217;s up to date, but I get a fail.</p>
<p>This is not a rush, but I thought it would be cool to leverage my ocaml beginnings with LaTeX something I use frequently.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve not much experience with makefiles. Here&#8217;s the dump:</p>
<p>File &#8220;ocamltex.ml&#8221;, line 28, characters 0-9:<br />
Unbound module Cash<br />
*** omake: 17/22 targets are up to date<br />
*** omake: failed (0.9 sec, 0/2 scans, 1/4 rules, 1/80 digests)<br />
*** omake: targets were not rebuilt because of errors:<br />
   ocamltex.cmo<br />
   ocamltex.cmi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kitby</title>
		<link>http://existentialtype.net/2006/11/15/the-eternal-stuggle/comment-page-1/#comment-774</link>
		<dc:creator>kitby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 15:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://existentialtype.net/?p=74#comment-774</guid>
		<description>Do people actually fall for spams which aren't even remotely "professional" looking?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do people actually fall for spams which aren&#8217;t even remotely &#8220;professional&#8221; looking?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
