Comments on: First look at Gentzen Symbol http://existentialtype.net/2007/10/05/first-look-at-gentzen-symbol/ For People Who Like Type and Types Thu, 10 May 2012 12:36:27 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: washburn http://existentialtype.net/2007/10/05/first-look-at-gentzen-symbol/comment-page-1/#comment-16775 washburn Sat, 06 Oct 2007 12:53:13 +0000 http://existentialtype.net/?p=168#comment-16775 Thanks as well :-) By »opened up« do you mean less concave? Thanks as well :-)

By »opened up« do you mean less concave?

]]> By: washburn http://existentialtype.net/2007/10/05/first-look-at-gentzen-symbol/comment-page-1/#comment-16773 washburn Sat, 06 Oct 2007 12:49:41 +0000 http://existentialtype.net/?p=168#comment-16773 Thanks. As for the base of the 1, I guess I do not find myself underlying too frequently in mathematical formulas. However, whether to use oldstyle (text) figures or lining figures will be configurable in the end. Thanks.

As for the base of the 1, I guess I do not find myself underlying too frequently in mathematical formulas. However, whether to use oldstyle (text) figures or lining figures will be configurable in the end.

]]> By: oxlahun http://existentialtype.net/2007/10/05/first-look-at-gentzen-symbol/comment-page-1/#comment-16769 oxlahun Sat, 06 Oct 2007 12:06:08 +0000 http://existentialtype.net/?p=168#comment-16769 I like it, too, but I think I'd be curious to see it with the inside of the parens opened up a hair. I like it, too, but I think I’d be curious to see it with the inside of the parens opened up a hair.

]]> By: Alan Schmitt http://existentialtype.net/2007/10/05/first-look-at-gentzen-symbol/comment-page-1/#comment-16760 Alan Schmitt Sat, 06 Oct 2007 05:58:43 +0000 http://existentialtype.net/?p=168#comment-16760 It looks nice, I really like the spacing and wheightier symbols, it makes things less diluted. I have a question about the '1' though: the base line seems very big, won't it look weird underlined? It looks nice, I really like the spacing and wheightier symbols, it makes things less diluted.

I have a question about the ’1′ though: the base line seems very big, won’t it look weird underlined?

]]>