<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Research continues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://existentialtype.net/2008/01/21/research-continues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://existentialtype.net/2008/01/21/research-continues/</link>
	<description>For People Who Like Type and Types</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 12:36:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Schmitt</title>
		<link>http://existentialtype.net/2008/01/21/research-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-21281</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Schmitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 08:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://existentialtype.net/2008/01/21/research-continues/#comment-21281</guid>
		<description>Well, the physical layout between azerty and qwerty keyboards is not that different on laptops (the azerty has one extra key, a smaller left shift (where the extra key is) and the return key is vertical instead of horizontal). I use an external keyboard with my laptop (the new bluetooth one, it&#039;s really very nice) that is qwerty and switching to the azerty one is really no trouble.

But you may be talking about the logical key layout. Then I&#039;ll just have one word for you: Dvorak ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the physical layout between azerty and qwerty keyboards is not that different on laptops (the azerty has one extra key, a smaller left shift (where the extra key is) and the return key is vertical instead of horizontal). I use an external keyboard with my laptop (the new bluetooth one, it&#8217;s really very nice) that is qwerty and switching to the azerty one is really no trouble.</p>
<p>But you may be talking about the logical key layout. Then I&#8217;ll just have one word for you: Dvorak <img src='http://existentialtype.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: washburn</title>
		<link>http://existentialtype.net/2008/01/21/research-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-21278</link>
		<dc:creator>washburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 07:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://existentialtype.net/2008/01/21/research-continues/#comment-21278</guid>
		<description>@Alan: Not to mention that if I bought it in Europe, I would probably have to put up with a funny keyboard layout :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Alan: Not to mention that if I bought it in Europe, I would probably have to put up with a funny keyboard layout <img src='http://existentialtype.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Schmitt</title>
		<link>http://existentialtype.net/2008/01/21/research-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-21277</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Schmitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 07:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://existentialtype.net/2008/01/21/research-continues/#comment-21277</guid>
		<description>I would definitely not buy a mac just for a new product, and not in Europe in any case (it&#039;s just way too expensive).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would definitely not buy a mac just for a new product, and not in Europe in any case (it&#8217;s just way too expensive).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: washburn</title>
		<link>http://existentialtype.net/2008/01/21/research-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-21264</link>
		<dc:creator>washburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://existentialtype.net/2008/01/21/research-continues/#comment-21264</guid>
		<description>@Alan:
I probably would have tried using handwriting recognition for that message, but I had forgotten my laptop&#039;s power supply at home, so I was trying to use it only when I needed to reference some information only on the laptop.  That e-mail was probably the most typing I did yesterday.

Yes, I had actually heard that MacSpeech was licensing Nuance&#039;s technology.  If it is priced anywhere near their current iListen product it will be vastly cheaper than Dragon Naturally Speaking Pro.  Naturally Speaking Pro is the only version of Nuance&#039;s product with macro support, but MacSpeech claims MacSpeech Dictate has AppleScript support.  I am told that if you can write macros for voice recognition it is possible to do some amount of programming via voice recognition.   The only problems are (a) I haven&#039;t imported my iMac yet and (b) the website says that MacSpeech Dictate will only work on Intel Macs anyway.  I had been thinking about buying a new Mac eventually, but I am not sure if now is the best time to be doing so financially.  So I need to think about it.  At the very least, I think I should wait to see what the reviews look like before I go out and buy a new Mac just to run the product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Alan:<br />
I probably would have tried using handwriting recognition for that message, but I had forgotten my laptop&#8217;s power supply at home, so I was trying to use it only when I needed to reference some information only on the laptop.  That e-mail was probably the most typing I did yesterday.</p>
<p>Yes, I had actually heard that MacSpeech was licensing Nuance&#8217;s technology.  If it is priced anywhere near their current iListen product it will be vastly cheaper than Dragon Naturally Speaking Pro.  Naturally Speaking Pro is the only version of Nuance&#8217;s product with macro support, but MacSpeech claims MacSpeech Dictate has AppleScript support.  I am told that if you can write macros for voice recognition it is possible to do some amount of programming via voice recognition.   The only problems are (a) I haven&#8217;t imported my iMac yet and (b) the website says that MacSpeech Dictate will only work on Intel Macs anyway.  I had been thinking about buying a new Mac eventually, but I am not sure if now is the best time to be doing so financially.  So I need to think about it.  At the very least, I think I should wait to see what the reviews look like before I go out and buy a new Mac just to run the product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Schmitt</title>
		<link>http://existentialtype.net/2008/01/21/research-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-21258</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Schmitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://existentialtype.net/2008/01/21/research-continues/#comment-21258</guid>
		<description>Good luck about this. How did you manage to type your very long message to the Types mailing list? Using the handwriting recognition software? 

By the way, I don&#039;t know if you&#039;ve heard but it was recently announced that Dragon Naturally Speaking was being ported to the Mac. This may be an alternative possibility for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good luck about this. How did you manage to type your very long message to the Types mailing list? Using the handwriting recognition software? </p>
<p>By the way, I don&#8217;t know if you&#8217;ve heard but it was recently announced that Dragon Naturally Speaking was being ported to the Mac. This may be an alternative possibility for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

