<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Higher-rank, impredicative polymorphism in Scala</title>
	<atom:link href="http://existentialtype.net/2008/03/09/higher-rank-impredicative-polymorphism-in-scala/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://existentialtype.net/2008/03/09/higher-rank-impredicative-polymorphism-in-scala/</link>
	<description>For People Who Like Type and Types</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 01:25:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: washburn</title>
		<link>http://existentialtype.net/2008/03/09/higher-rank-impredicative-polymorphism-in-scala/comment-page-1/#comment-55277</link>
		<dc:creator>washburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 01:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://existentialtype.net/2008/03/09/higher-rank-impredicative-polymorphism-in-scala/#comment-55277</guid>
		<description>For the mathematics I think I just manually selected the correct unicode symbols and paste them in.  The code is highlighted using a plugin that builds on GeSHi.  I think at the time there wasn&#039;t a Scala formatter so I had to roll my own.  It looks like the current version of GeSHi has Scala support out of the box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the mathematics I think I just manually selected the correct unicode symbols and paste them in.  The code is highlighted using a plugin that builds on GeSHi.  I think at the time there wasn&#8217;t a Scala formatter so I had to roll my own.  It looks like the current version of GeSHi has Scala support out of the box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Czerwonka</title>
		<link>http://existentialtype.net/2008/03/09/higher-rank-impredicative-polymorphism-in-scala/comment-page-1/#comment-55273</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Czerwonka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 19:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://existentialtype.net/2008/03/09/higher-rank-impredicative-polymorphism-in-scala/#comment-55273</guid>
		<description>Great article.  Both well written and easy to read.  What are you rendering your examples with?  Looks great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article.  Both well written and easy to read.  What are you rendering your examples with?  Looks great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ∃xistential Type &#187; Revisiting higher-rank impredicative polymorphism in Scala</title>
		<link>http://existentialtype.net/2008/03/09/higher-rank-impredicative-polymorphism-in-scala/comment-page-1/#comment-22799</link>
		<dc:creator>∃xistential Type &#187; Revisiting higher-rank impredicative polymorphism in Scala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 10:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://existentialtype.net/2008/03/09/higher-rank-impredicative-polymorphism-in-scala/#comment-22799</guid>
		<description>[...] be doing. So I expect this will be a bit more terse than I might like. Anyway, when I wrote about encoding higher-rank universal quantification in Scala back in March, I used a rather elaborate scheme involving the use of Scala&#039;s first-class existential quantifiers. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] be doing. So I expect this will be a bit more terse than I might like. Anyway, when I wrote about encoding higher-rank universal quantification in Scala back in March, I used a rather elaborate scheme involving the use of Scala&#8217;s first-class existential quantifiers. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ∃xistential Type &#187; Correction on existential unpacking</title>
		<link>http://existentialtype.net/2008/03/09/higher-rank-impredicative-polymorphism-in-scala/comment-page-1/#comment-22004</link>
		<dc:creator>∃xistential Type &#187; Correction on existential unpacking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 20:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://existentialtype.net/2008/03/09/higher-rank-impredicative-polymorphism-in-scala/#comment-22004</guid>
		<description>[...] after thinking about it further, I was incorrect, and it is possible to explicitly unpack existentials in Scala. As with some other languages, it is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] after thinking about it further, I was incorrect, and it is possible to explicitly unpack existentials in Scala. As with some other languages, it is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

