<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>∃xistential Type &#187; judgmental</title>
	<atom:link href="http://existentialtype.net/tag/judgmental/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://existentialtype.net</link>
	<description>For People Who Like Type and Types</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 16:35:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Focusing and higher-order abstract syntax</title>
		<link>http://existentialtype.net/2008/02/17/focusing-and-higher-order-abstract-syntax/</link>
		<comments>http://existentialtype.net/2008/02/17/focusing-and-higher-order-abstract-syntax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 12:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>washburn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[languages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[types]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constructive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[focusing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HOAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgmental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ludics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rsi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://existentialtype.net/2008/02/17/focusing-and-higher-order-abstract-syntax/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I figured I would take a few minutes to point out that Noam Zeilberger had an excellent paper in POPL this year on Focusing and higher-order abstract syntax. I've spent some time in the past trying to better understand Andreoli's material on focusing and Girard's* Ludics from the judgmental perspective that I became accustomed to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I figured I would take a few minutes to point out that <a href="http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~noam/">Noam Zeilberger</a> had an excellent paper in <a href="http://www.cs.ucsd.edu/popl/08/">POPL this year</a> on <a href="http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~noam/research/focusing-hoas.pdf">Focusing and higher-order abstract syntax</a>. I've spent some time in the past trying to better understand <a href="http://www.xrce.xerox.com/people/andreoli/">Andreoli's</a> material on focusing and <a href="http://iml.univ-mrs.fr/~girard/">Girard's</a><sup>*</sup> <a href="http://iml.univ-mrs.fr/~girard/0.pdf.gz">Ludics</a> from the judgmental perspective that I became accustomed to in my formative years, but I never really came up with anything. I found Noam's computational interpertation of focusing quite pleasing.</p>
<p>One low tech solution that has really been helping my wrists lately is that I obtained adjustable height desk for my office.  The desks that came with my office were definitely far too tall for me (even when my chair at its maximum height).</p>
<p><sup>*</sup> Girard seems to have redecorated his website since I last visited.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://existentialtype.net/2008/02/17/focusing-and-higher-order-abstract-syntax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

